Shaping Markets Through Temporal, Constructive, and Interactive Agency.
Pontikes, E.G. and V. Rindova (2020). “Shaping Markets Through Temporal, Constructive, and Interactive Agency.” Strategy Science.
Category Strategy for Firm Advantage
Pontikes, E.G. (2018). “Category Strategy for Firm Advantage.” Strategy Science, 3(4): 555-682.
Category innovation in the software industry: 1990 – 2002
Pontikes, E.G. “Category innovation in the software industry: 1990 – 2002.”
Concepts and Categories: Foundations for Sociological Analysis
Hannan, M. G. Le Mens, G. Hsu, B. Kovacs, G. Negro, L. Polos, E. Pontikes and A. Sharkey. Concepts and Categories: Foundations for Sociological Analysis. Columbia University Press.
The Categorical Basis of Combination
Pontikes, E.G. “The Categorical Basis of Combination. A Theory and Two Empirical Tests.”
Destigmatization and Its Imbalanced Effects
Negro, G., M.L. Williams and E.G. Pontikes. “Destigmatization and Its Imbalanced Effects.”
Bad Company: The Reputational Implications of Cross-Sector Interactions with a Stigmatized Firm
McDonnell, M.H. and E.G. Pontikes. “Bad Company: The Reputational Implications of Cross-Sector Interactions with a Stigmatized Firm.”
The Non-consensus Entrepreneur: Organizational Responses to Vital Events
Pontikes, E.G. and W.P. Barnett (2017). “The Non-consensus Entrepreneur: Organizational Responses to Vital Events.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 62(1): 140-178.
Strategic Categorization. in From Categories to Categorization: Studies in Sociology, Organizations and Strategy at the Crossroads
Pontikes, E.G. and R. Kim (2017). “Strategic Categorization.” in From Categories to Categorization: Studies in Sociology, Organizations and Strategy at the Crossroads (Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Volume 51). Durand, R., N. Granqvist, and A. Tyllström (eds), Emerald Publishing Limited, pp. 71-111.
The Coevolution of Organizational Knowledge and Market Technology
Pontikes, E.G. and W.P. Barnett (2017). “The Coevolution of Organizational Knowledge and Market Technology.” Strategy Science, 2(1): 64-82.
